lebedev.ri added a comment. In D57615#1381418 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57615#1381418>, @ABataev wrote:
> In D57615#1381416 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57615#1381416>, @lebedev.ri > wrote: > > > @ABataev i'm not sure i have fully followed the > > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563#c1 > > > > > The outlined function is not generated for the loop, so there is no > > > problem with the standard compatibility. > > > > Are you saying that in these cases of `master`, `critical`, `single` > > directives, `CapturedDecl` should **not** have `nothrow` bit set too? > > > This flag just does not matter for them. I'll rephrase: Are you opposed to providing the correct (as per the specification) knowledge that no exception will escape out of these `CapturedDecl`'s, because that knowledge does not matter for the existing sema/codegen, and does not affect produced IR? Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57615/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57615 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
