krytarowski added a comment. > chandlerc added a comment. > > There was a long discussion between two NetBSD maintainers about this (both > already in the reviewers list of this patch). I'm not sure if there is an > existing thread that would be better to follow up on as opposed to starting a > fresh thread.
The discussion is ongoing since 2017 and we have an impasse. > I think the question was: should the path search logic be handled in the > `clang` driver or in LLD itself. FWIW, I prefer that NetBSD follow the same > design as every other platform here with the (somewhat C and C++ specific) > search logic provided by the `clang` driver. Path logic is unfortunately just the tip of iceberg of customization we need, but it's true that its the first problem to encounter when attempting to use lld/NetBSD. Depending on the approach of solving it we can follow up with other changes. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56650/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56650 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
