LegalizeAdulthood added inline comments.
================
Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-simplify-boolean-expr.rst:59
@@ -56,3 +58,3 @@
4. The conditional return ``if (p) return true; return false;`` has an
implicit conversion of a pointer to ``bool`` and becomes
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Update for member pointers.
Do I really need to explicitly say member pointer as well? It seems redundant.
I didn't update it because a pointer to a member is a pointer. When used as an
implicit conversion to `bool`, the syntax is no different for a plain pointer
than for a member pointer. If the syntax were different, I could see your
point.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16308
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
