koldaniel marked an inline comment as done. koldaniel added inline comments.
================ Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-redundant-keyword.rst:8 + +`extern` is redundant in function declarations + ---------------- alexfh wrote: > xazax.hun wrote: > > alexfh wrote: > > > Could you explain, why you think `extern` is redundant in function > > > declarations? > > Just to be clear here, do you think there is a case where extern is not > > redundant or you just want the documentation to be extended? > Sorry for being unclear. I would expect a more in-depth explanation of why > the keyword is redundant with references to the appropriate sections of the > standard or some other authoritative source. https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/language_linkage The default language linkage is C++, so without any additional parameters it is redundant (**extern "C++"** can also be redundant, but it depends on the context). In C context (**extern "C"**) the situation is the same, **extern** keyword is redundant for function declarations (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf - 6.2.2.5) Repository: rL LLVM CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D33841/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D33841 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
