lebedev.ri added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/AST/ASTTypeTraits.cpp:40-43
+ { NKI_None, "OMPClause" },
+#define OPENMP_CLAUSE(TextualSpelling, DERIVED)
\
+ {NKI_OMPClause, #TextualSpelling},
+#include "clang/Basic/OpenMPKinds.def"
----------------
Humm, though i guess this will need to be changed back for when the matchers
evolve
from the check into the ASTMatchers, for better clang-query expirience.
Would it be ok to add the opposite direction functionality
as compared to `static ASTNodeKind getFromNode(const OMPClause &C);`?
I.e. roughly `OMPClauseKind getOMPClauseKindFromASTNodeKind() const;` ?
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
