xazax.hun added a comment. In D57230#1372523 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230#1372523>, @NoQ wrote:
> In D57230#1372488 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230#1372488>, @xazax.hun wrote: > > > In D57230#1372275 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230#1372275>, @NoQ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have success reducing false positives using creduce? My problem > > usually is that we cannot tell if a reduction rendered a false positive > > into a true positive. > > > False positives - no. Improvements and regressions - totally! Just run two > different clangs in the creduce test and check that there's a difference in > results. Oh, I see. Great idea, I never did this. Will look into it. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
