dblaikie added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/AST/ast-dump-decl.m:90
// CHECK-NEXT: -ObjCProtocol {{.+}} 'P'
+// CHECK-NEXT: -ObjCTypeParamDecl {{.+}} <col:33> col:33 T 'id':'id'
----------------
steveire wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > It seems strange to me to print out the type parameter after the superclass
> > information given the source order. My understanding of the AST dumping
> > order is that we try to keep the order of nodes in source order whenever
> > possible.
> That is not really a possible thing to try to do, because the AST dump
> doesn't relate to a single language. It should be seen as language
> independent.
>
> The principle I'm follow is that nodes dump themselves in entirety before
> starting to dump their child nodes. That is a principle already followed by
> most nodes. Changing this seems to be low cost, low impact and high benefit
> to the code.
>That is not really a possible thing to try to do, because the AST dump doesn't
>relate to a single language. It should be seen as language independent.
Is this particular aspect different between the different source languages
Clang supports? (could you give examples?)
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55394/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55394
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
