eugenis added a comment. In D56109#1341967 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56109#1341967>, @mgorny wrote:
> We've been discussing this, and I think we're doing this the wrong way. Could > you help me a little understand this? > > In particular, what is the purpose of unpoisoning file? Is it in order to > account for stdio functions being implemented inline or as macros, and > therefore user code accessing internal `FILE` members? Or is there some other > use case for this? > > If only the former, then I think there is no purpose in definining > `__sanitizer_FILE` on NetBSD, as we support only reentrant interfaces which > are all implemented as libc routine calls. Yes, AFAIR unpoisoning of struct FILE was done specifically to support inlined and _unlocked stdio functions. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56109/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56109 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
