Author: abataev
Date: Wed Jan  9 07:58:05 2019
New Revision: 350734

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=350734&view=rev
Log:
Incorrect implicit data-sharing for nested tasks
Summary:
There is a minor issue in how the implicit data-sharings for nested tasks are 
computed.

For the following example:
```
int x;
#pragma omp task shared(x)
#pragma omp task
x++;
```
We compute an implicit data-sharing of shared for `x` in the second task 
although I think that it should be firstprivate. Below you can find the part of 
the OpenMP spec that covers this example:
- // In a task generating construct, if no default clause is present, a 
variable for which the data-sharing attribute is not determined by the rules 
above and that in the enclosing context is determined to be shared by all 
implicit tasks bound to the current team is shared.//
- //In a task generating construct, if no default clause is present, a variable 
for which the data-sharing attribute is not determined by the rules above is 
firstprivate.//

Since each implicit-task has its own copy of `x`, we shouldn't apply the first 
rule.

Reviewers: ABataev

Reviewed By: ABataev

Subscribers: cfe-commits, rogfer01

Tags: #openmp

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56430

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp
    cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/task_messages.cpp

Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp
URL: 
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp?rev=350734&r1=350733&r2=350734&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp Wed Jan  9 07:58:05 2019
@@ -676,9 +676,13 @@ public:
   }
 
 };
-bool isParallelOrTaskRegion(OpenMPDirectiveKind DKind) {
-  return isOpenMPParallelDirective(DKind) || isOpenMPTaskingDirective(DKind) ||
-         isOpenMPTeamsDirective(DKind) || DKind == OMPD_unknown;
+
+bool isImplicitTaskingRegion(OpenMPDirectiveKind DKind) {
+  return isOpenMPParallelDirective(DKind) || isOpenMPTeamsDirective(DKind);
+}
+
+bool isImplicitOrExplicitTaskingRegion(OpenMPDirectiveKind DKind) {
+  return isImplicitTaskingRegion(DKind) || isOpenMPTaskingDirective(DKind) || 
DKind == OMPD_unknown;
 }
 
 } // namespace
@@ -819,7 +823,7 @@ DSAStackTy::DSAVarData DSAStackTy::getDS
           DVar.CKind = OMPC_firstprivate;
           return DVar;
         }
-      } while (I != E && !isParallelOrTaskRegion(I->Directive));
+      } while (I != E && !isImplicitTaskingRegion(I->Directive));
       DVar.CKind =
           (DVarTemp.CKind == OMPC_unknown) ? OMPC_firstprivate : OMPC_shared;
       return DVar;
@@ -1066,7 +1070,7 @@ bool DSAStackTy::isOpenMPLocal(VarDecl *
   if (!isStackEmpty()) {
     iterator I = Iter, E = Stack.back().first.rend();
     Scope *TopScope = nullptr;
-    while (I != E && !isParallelOrTaskRegion(I->Directive) &&
+    while (I != E && !isImplicitOrExplicitTaskingRegion(I->Directive) &&
            !isOpenMPTargetExecutionDirective(I->Directive))
       ++I;
     if (I == E)
@@ -1292,7 +1296,7 @@ DSAStackTy::hasDSA(ValueDecl *D,
   if (FromParent && I != EndI)
     std::advance(I, 1);
   for (; I != EndI; std::advance(I, 1)) {
-    if (!DPred(I->Directive) && !isParallelOrTaskRegion(I->Directive))
+    if (!DPred(I->Directive) && 
!isImplicitOrExplicitTaskingRegion(I->Directive))
       continue;
     iterator NewI = I;
     DSAVarData DVar = getDSA(NewI, D);
@@ -1636,7 +1640,7 @@ VarDecl *Sema::isOpenMPCapturedDecl(Valu
     auto &&Info = DSAStack->isLoopControlVariable(D);
     if (Info.first ||
         (VD && VD->hasLocalStorage() &&
-         isParallelOrTaskRegion(DSAStack->getCurrentDirective())) ||
+         isImplicitOrExplicitTaskingRegion(DSAStack->getCurrentDirective())) ||
         (VD && DSAStack->isForceVarCapturing()))
       return VD ? VD : Info.second;
     DSAStackTy::DSAVarData DVarPrivate =
@@ -2244,7 +2248,7 @@ public:
       // attribute, must have its data-sharing attribute explicitly determined
       // by being listed in a data-sharing attribute clause.
       if (DVar.CKind == OMPC_unknown && Stack->getDefaultDSA() == DSA_none &&
-          isParallelOrTaskRegion(DKind) &&
+          isImplicitOrExplicitTaskingRegion(DKind) &&
           VarsWithInheritedDSA.count(VD) == 0) {
         VarsWithInheritedDSA[VD] = E;
         return;

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/task_messages.cpp
URL: 
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/task_messages.cpp?rev=350734&r1=350733&r2=350734&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/task_messages.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/task_messages.cpp Wed Jan  9 07:58:05 2019
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ void foo() {
 #pragma omp task // expected-error {{unexpected OpenMP directive '#pragma omp 
task'}}
 
 class S {
-  S(const S &s) { a = s.a + 12; } // expected-note 14 {{implicitly declared 
private here}}
+  S(const S &s) { a = s.a + 12; } // expected-note 16 {{implicitly declared 
private here}}
   int a;
 
 public:
@@ -51,6 +51,15 @@ int foo() {
   ++a; // expected-error {{calling a private constructor of class 'S'}}
 #pragma omp task default(shared)
 #pragma omp task
+  // expected-error@+1 {{calling a private constructor of class 'S'}}
+  ++a;
+#pragma omp parallel shared(a)
+#pragma omp task
+#pragma omp task
+  ++a;
+#pragma omp parallel shared(a)
+#pragma omp task default(shared)
+#pragma omp task
   ++a;
 #pragma omp task
 #pragma omp parallel
@@ -205,6 +214,15 @@ L2:
   ++sa; // expected-error {{calling a private constructor of class 'S'}}
 #pragma omp task default(shared)
 #pragma omp task
+  // expected-error@+1 {{calling a private constructor of class 'S'}}
+  ++sa;
+#pragma omp parallel shared(sa)
+#pragma omp task
+#pragma omp task
+  ++sa;
+#pragma omp parallel shared(sa)
+#pragma omp task default(shared)
+#pragma omp task
   ++sa;
 #pragma omp task
 #pragma omp parallel


_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to