ilya-biryukov added a comment. @hokein, do you need reviewers for this? I'm happy to volunteer.
In D56314#1347511 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56314#1347511>, @nridge wrote: > Might we want to keep some of this information for `workspace/symbol`? I > mean, surely not "documentation", but perhaps "signature" and "return type"? There's nothing stopping us from reintroducing this information if we start doing the same. I don't foresee difficulties with this. It would be easier to figure out the bits we actually need when we implement this functionality. But I generally prefer to move fast and fix things as you go, even if that means going back and forth, others might disagree. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56314/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56314 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
