ilya-biryukov added a comment. In D55994#1344717 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D55994#1344717>, @jkorous wrote:
> @ilya-biryukov Yes, that's true. I would still expect some performance gain > in more restrictive filtering on client's side - not sure how big though. > Anyway, seems like LSP folks think character + trigger context is good > enough. For example here: > https://github.com/Microsoft/language-server-protocol/issues/138 That would definitely mean less completion requests from the client, I doubt it would be the bottleneck for performance, though. Thanks for the pointers, an insightful conversation on almost the same issue there. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55994/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55994 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
