bernhardmgruber marked 2 inline comments as done.
bernhardmgruber added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/clang-tidy/modernize-use-trailing-return.cpp:2
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s modernize-use-trailing-return %t -- -- --std=c++14
+
+namespace std {
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> lebedev.ri wrote:
> > Missing test coverage:
> > * macros
> > * is there tests for implicit functions?
> > * Out-of-line function with body.
> Also:
> * functions with attributes in the type position `int f() [[]];`
> * functions without attributes in the type position `[[]] int f();` and
> `int f [[]] ();`
> * lambdas?
> * Special functions without return types, like constructors and destructors
> * Conversion operators. `struct S { operator int() const; };`
@lebedev.ri: I do not understand what kind of tests I should write for macros.
Do you mean to rewrite functions inside macro definitions as well?
like rewriting
```
#define DEFINE_F int f();
```
into
```
#define DEFINE_F auto f() -> int;
```
Apart from that, I believe a lot of difficult trickery can be done with macros
and I am fine without supporting those (i.e. omitting a possible rewrite,
erroneus replacements should never happen). Can you come up with a particular
example you would like to be rewritten?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56160/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56160
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
