Author: dergachev Date: Wed Dec 19 13:51:59 2018 New Revision: 349683 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=349683&view=rev Log: [analyzer] CStringChecker: Add the forgotten test file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55873 rdar://problem/45366551 Added: cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/string.cpp Added: cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/string.cpp URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/string.cpp?rev=349683&view=auto ============================================================================== --- cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/string.cpp (added) +++ cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/string.cpp Wed Dec 19 13:51:59 2018 @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,unix -verify %s + +// expected-no-diagnostics + +// Test functions that are called "memcpy" but aren't the memcpy +// we're looking for. Unfortunately, this test cannot be put into +// a namespace. The out-of-class weird memcpy needs to be recognized +// as a normal C function for the test to make sense. +typedef __typeof(sizeof(int)) size_t; +void *memcpy(void *, const void *, size_t); + +struct S { + static S s1, s2; + + // A weird overload within the class that accepts a structure reference + // instead of a pointer. + void memcpy(void *, const S &, size_t); + void test_in_class_weird_memcpy() { + memcpy(this, s2, 1); // no-crash + } +}; + +// A similarly weird overload outside of the class. +void *memcpy(void *, const S &, size_t); + +void test_out_of_class_weird_memcpy() { + memcpy(&S::s1, S::s2, 1); // no-crash +} _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
