On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 03:05:26PM -0800, Zhao, Weiming via cfe-commits wrote: > I agree what you said about different code generated with clang and GCC > generates. In this case, we should throw an error (err_late_asm_label). > > But in this example, there is no use of the function. They are just > redundant declarations and there is no actual code generated. > So I suggest we just give warnings for this case. Otherwise, it will break > existing code like some SPEC benchmarks.
By the same argument, redefinitions with different types should be valid in C. I don't like this slippery slope at all, code should really be just fixed here. Joerg _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
