Szelethus added a comment.
Okay, I submit! :D
================
Comment at: test/Analysis/use-after-move.cpp:260-262
for (int i = 0; i < bignum(); i++) { // expected-note {{Loop condition is
false. Execution jumps to the end of the function}}
rightRefCall(std::move(a)); // no-warning
}
----------------
NoQ wrote:
> This would have been the test for our case, but in this test the function has
> a body and will not be evaluated conservatively.
Hmm, since those are all STL containers, we should be able to have their
definition? Or only with `c++-container-inlining=true`? Take this as more of a
question than anything else.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54563/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54563
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
