alexfh accepted this revision.
alexfh added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Looks good with one nit. I'll update the comment myself and commit the patch
for you.
Thank you for the contribution!
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/misc/VirtualNearMissCheck.cpp:60
@@ +59,3 @@
+ }
+ } else if (const auto *DerivedRT = DerivedReturnTy->getAs<ReferenceType>()) {
+ if (const auto *BaseRT = BaseReturnTy->getAs<ReferenceType>()) {
----------------
Answering my own question: I guess, it may be useful for methods of template
classes and for template methods, where the template declaration doesn't make
it clear whether the method is overridden or not. However the author may want
the compiler to ensure the instantiation actually overrides something.
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/misc/VirtualNearMissCheck.h:39
@@ +38,3 @@
+ ///
+ /// It should look up the PossibleMap or update it.
+ bool isPossibleToBeOverridden(const CXXMethodDecl *BaseMD);
----------------
nit: `It should look up ...` sounds like a requirement, however, you exactly
know what the implementation does, so `It looks up ... or updates ...` is
better. Maybe even `Results are memoized in PossibleMap.`
Same below.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15823
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
