Thanks I’ll take a look.

BTW when reverting could you use “git revert” or mention manually the 
phabricator revision being reverted,
and apply reverts atomically?
I (and many others) work exclusively using a git monorepo, so I don’t even have 
a straightforward way to lookup what "r347951” is.
Thanks!

> On Nov 30, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:19 PM George Karpenkov <ekarpen...@apple.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks and sorry about the trouble. I’ll recommit with size_t.
> 
> No worries, it happens! FYI, I also had to commit r348023 as part of
> the reverts.
> 
> ~Aaron
>> 
>> On Nov 30, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 9:37 AM Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via
>> cfe-commits <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> NoQ added inline comments.
>> 
>> 
>> ================
>> Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/osobject-retain-release.cpp:27
>> +
>> +  static void * operator new(unsigned long size);
>> +
>> ----------------
>> NoQ wrote:
>> 
>> I think we should use `size_t` as much as possible, because this may 
>> otherwise have weird consequences on platforms on which `size_t` is not 
>> defined as `unsigned long`. Not sure if this checker is ran on such 
>> platforms. But the test doesn't have the triple specified, so it runs under 
>> the host triple, which may be arbitrary and cause problems on buildbots.
>> 
>> I.e.,
>> 
>> ```
>> typedef __typeof(sizeof(int)) size_t;
>> // use size_t
>> ```
>> 
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv8-lld/builds/440/steps/ninja%20check%202/logs/FAIL%3A%20Clang%3A%3Aosobject-retain-release.cpp
>> 
>> 
>> I reverted r347949 through r347951 in r348020 to get the bots back to green.
>> 
>> ~Aaron
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Repository:
>> rC Clang
>> 
>> CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D55076/new/
>> 
>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D55076
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>> 
>> 

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to