sammccall added a comment. In D54945#1309467 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D54945#1309467>, @JonasToth wrote:
> I like the overview, maybe a link to `clangd` here might help, as there is > currently a lot of effort of integrating `clang-tidy` into it. (@sammccall > WDYT?) This would be great! The integration is not yet complete, so I'm not sure if it's best to add now or later. For the table: - on-the-fly inspection: yes (I think - this means showing fixes overlaid on the code as you edit, right?) - check list configuration (GUI): no - options to checks (GUI): no - configuration via .clang-tidy file: this will be the supported mechanism. Not done yet. - custom clang-tidy binary: no The behavior today is that three hard-coded checks are always enabled, as a proof-of-concept. Configuration via .clang-tidy is the main missing piece. Clang-tidy diagnostics are shown along with others, as-you-type. Fixes can be applied. Static analyzer checks will probably never be supported. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D54945/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D54945 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
