cameron.mcinally added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53157#1304900, @andrew.w.kaylor wrote:
> I think at this point we're all on the same page in this regard. I just > wanted to make sure we also understand why we're on that page. I still > believe it was the correct choice. Yup, we're on the same page. To explain where I'm coming from, our in-house compiler has tracked down *many* of the trap-unsafe transformations in LLVM and can toggle them as desired. The execution penalty for running trap-safe code is (much) less than 5% with that compiler. My goal for this project is to make Clang competitive with that compiler. https://reviews.llvm.org/D53157 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
