riccibruno added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54676#1302510, @rjmccall wrote:
> I don't think we should be reducing the number of call arguments we can > support, sorry, even if 16K is a fairly absurd number that would probably > trip stack overflow protections if you actually executed it. Let's try to > keep it at least 64K-ish. Would 15 bits be alright ? `NumParams` in `FunctionTypeBitfields` was 15 bits wide since early 2013. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D54676 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
