NoQ added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54557#1299899, @Szelethus wrote:
> I think we should either remove the non-default functionality (which wouldn't > be ideal), or emphasise somewhere (open projects?) that there is still work > to be done, but leaving it to be forgotten and essentially making it an extra > maintenance work would be, in my optinion, the worst case scenario. > `Aggressive` isn't `Pedantic` because it actually emits warnings on correct > code, and it's not a simple matter of too many reports being emitted, let's > also document that this is an experimental feature, not a power-user-only > thing. I only kept the option around because i was under an impression that i'm intruding into a checker that already has some happy users, probably breaking existing workflows. If this option is unnecessary, i'd be happy to remove it :) Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D54557 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
