kristina added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54344#1294942, @erik.pilkington wrote:
> LGTM too, with one small fix in test. Thanks for working on this! Well, I figured since the assertion being tripped was (before investigation) the only reliable way to notice the bug it makes sense for it to stay in, main concern being that should anything regress and assertions are off, the code generation is essentially undefined. Though a good argument for taking it out would be the fact that currently it's the only test that verifies IR generated with the attribute (last time I checked), but I would also imagine most people running tests would have assertion enabled (or debug) builds. Though I'm happy to revise the test to remove the assertion requirement, deferring to your judgement with regards to above. Aside from that, are you happy for me to land this after the revision? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D54344 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
