vsapsai added a comment. OK. Good to know you are still working on it.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47687#1271880, @Higuoxing wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47687#1266893, @vsapsai wrote: > > > Sorry about the delay. The change seems to be correct but `ninja > > check-clang` reveals the test "Misc/caret-diags-macros.c" is failing. Can > > you please look into that? > > > Hi, It's because the expression is given in multiple lines and my > `SuggestParentheses` cannot give proper fix-it hint. But I could give proper > `ParenRange` in macros. Shall we reserve current `SuggestParentheses` and > just give Parenrange hit in macros ? I have no idea about this ... Why is the expression on multiple lines in this case? I didn't check in debugger but the test case looks like you can place `)` between `BAD_CONDITIONAL_OPERATOR` and `;`. At least that's what I would expect as compiler user. llvm-project/clang/test/Misc/caret-diags-macros.c:125:38: warning: operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'; '+' will be evaluated first int test4 = BAD_CONDITIONAL_OPERATOR+BAD_CONDITIONAL_OPERATOR; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ llvm-project/clang/test/Misc/caret-diags-macros.c:124:39: note: expanded from macro 'BAD_CONDITIONAL_OPERATOR' #define BAD_CONDITIONAL_OPERATOR (2<3)?2:3 ^ llvm-project/clang/test/Misc/caret-diags-macros.c:125:38: note: place parentheses around the '+' expression to silence this warning llvm-project/clang/test/Misc/caret-diags-macros.c:124:39: note: expanded from macro 'BAD_CONDITIONAL_OPERATOR' #define BAD_CONDITIONAL_OPERATOR (2<3)?2:3 ^ llvm-project/clang/test/Misc/caret-diags-macros.c:125:38: note: place parentheses around the '?:' expression to evaluate it first int test4 = BAD_CONDITIONAL_OPERATOR+BAD_CONDITIONAL_OPERATOR; ^ ( llvm-project/clang/test/Misc/caret-diags-macros.c:124:39: note: expanded from macro 'BAD_CONDITIONAL_OPERATOR' #define BAD_CONDITIONAL_OPERATOR (2<3)?2:3 ^ https://reviews.llvm.org/D47687 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits