rjmccall added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53153#1288083, @arsenm wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53153#1288059, @rjmccall wrote: > > > I agree with Richard that I'm not sure what the point of supporting > > frontend visibility settings in OpenCL is. If you want the "everything is > > internal to the image" optimization, presumably you can just infer > > visibility on everything in a pass over the IR. > > > Eventually we want to support linking object files, and setting the > visibility in the IR won't be aware of any user specified visibility But do you want to support *dynamically* linking object files? Because that's what visibility is about. https://reviews.llvm.org/D53153 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits