rjmccall added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53153#1288083, @arsenm wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53153#1288059, @rjmccall wrote:
>
> > I agree with Richard that I'm not sure what the point of supporting 
> > frontend visibility settings in OpenCL is.  If you want the "everything is 
> > internal to the image" optimization, presumably you can just infer 
> > visibility on everything in a pass over the IR.
>
>
> Eventually we want to support linking object files, and setting the 
> visibility in the IR won't be aware of any user specified visibility


But do you want to support *dynamically* linking object files?  Because that's 
what visibility is about.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D53153



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to