hjl.tools added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53919#1282692, @efriedma wrote:
> As far as I know, according to the ABI docs, it's impossible to return a > 256-bit vector from a function if AVX is disabled. > > Given that we aren't rejecting the testcase, we're effectively implementing a > new "no-AVX" ABI variant. That variant is not defined anywhere, so we might > as well pick the fastest convention, returning the value in registers. I'm > not sure why you would want to return the vector in memory instead. Not a new "no-AVX" ABI variant. It should be pre-AVX ABI. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D53919 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
