rsmith added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53787#1279913, @phosek wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53787#1279899, @rsmith wrote: > > > Replacing the global new and delete is supposed to be a whole-program > > operation (you only get one global allocator). Otherwise you couldn't > > allocate memory in one DSO and deallocate it in another. (And nor could > > inline functions etc.) > > > > If you really want to do this weird thing, and you understand what you're > > getting yourself into, I don't see a problem with having a dedicated flag > > for it, but don't break all existing users of -fvisibility=. > > > That sounds reasonable, do you have any suggestion for the name of such flag? `-fglobal-new-delete-visibility=` is the first thing that springs to mind, but maybe there's something better? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D53787 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits