kadircet added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp:5101
+ const auto *ND = Base.getType()->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
+ if (isa<ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl>(ND) ||
+ isa<ClassTemplatePartialSpecializationDecl>(ND)) {
----------------
kadircet wrote:
> ilya-biryukov wrote:
> > Why special-case the template specializations?
> > Are we trying to provide results for dependent types here?
> Sorry, my bad forgot to add a comment. It is rather for backward
> compatibility. Since previous version was adding results directly without
> consulting results, it also added template specializations, whereas current
> version can't add them due to the filtering in
> resultbuilder(https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/master/lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp#L543).
> So, special casing in here to make sure we still provide those results, but
> can be deleted if seems unimportant.
>
> Not adding a comment until we decide on keeping/deleting the special case.
without consulting results -> without consulting "ResultBuilder"
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53654
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
