takuto.ikuta added a comment.
Thank you for review!
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:5599
+bool Sema::isInlineFunctionDLLExportable(const CXXMethodDecl *MD) {
+ assert(MD->isInlined());
----------------
hans wrote:
> Okay, breaking out this logic is a little better, but I still don't like that
> we now have split the "inherit dllexport attribute" in two places: one for
> non-inline functions and one for inline (even if they both call this
> function). It feels like it will be hard to maintain.
>
> Here is another idea:
>
> When we inherit the dllexport attribute to class members, if
> getLangOpts().DllExportInlines is false, we don't put dllexport on inline
> functions, but instead we put a new attribute "dllexportstaticlocals".
>
> That attribute only has the effect that it makes static locals exported. We
> would check for it when computing the linkage of the static local, similar to
> how it works in hidden functions.
>
> This has two benefits: it doesn't complicate the "inherit dllexport" code
> very much, and it avoids the need for a separate AST walk of the function.
>
> What do you think?
I implemented your idea the way I understood.
Use new attribute to check static local var later.
Due to difference of treating between linkage and dll attribute, I inherit dll
attribute in Sema/SemaDecl.cpp instead of AST/Decl.cpp
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51340
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
