krasimir added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52676#1251391, @oleg.smolsky wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52676#1251342, @krasimir wrote:
>
> > Digging a bit further, seems like the behavior you're looking for could be 
> > achieved by setting the `AlignAfterOpenBracket` option to `DontAlign` or 
> > `AlwaysBreak`:
> >
> >   % clang-format -style='{BasedOnStyle: google, AlignAfterOpenBracket: 
> > AlwaysBreak}' test.cc
> >    void f() {
> >      something->Method2s(
> >          1,
> >          [this] {
> >            Do1();
> >            Do2();
> >          },
> >          1);
> >    }
> >    % clang-format -style='{BasedOnStyle: google, AlignAfterOpenBracket: 
> > DontAlign}' test.cc
> >    void f() {
> >      something->Method2s(1,
> >          [this] {
> >            Do1();
> >            Do2();
> >          },
> >          1);
> >    }
> >
> > Does this work for you?
>
>
> This is interesting. It obviously does what I want with the lambda, but 
> forces this:
>
>   void f() {
>     auto stub = PopulateContextHereAndHereSomethi(GetSomethingHere(),
>                                                   GetSomethingElseHere());
>   }
>
>
> into this:
>
>   void f() {
>     auto stub = PopulateContextHereAndHereSomethi(
>         GetSomethingHere(), GetSomethingElseHere());
>   }
>
> The former looks better to me and that's what Emacs does when you press Tab. 
> I think people here at work will balk at this formatting...
>
> > I don't think modifying the behavior as posed in this change based on the 
> > existence of multiline lambdas and the value of the `BinPackArguments` 
> > option is better than what we have now, especially when 
> > `AlignAfterOpenBracket=Align`.
>
> Yeah, I hear you. The patch is intended to work with 
> `AlignAfterOpenBracket=Align` and `BinPackArguments=false` and only tweaks 
> the lambdas' placement.
>
> How about I key the new behavior off a new value of `AlignAfterOpenBracket`, 
> such as `AlignAfterOpenBracket=AlignExceptLambda`?


Sorry, I don't think we want to support something this specific. I'd like to 
hear djasper@ and klimek@ opinions about this.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D52676



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to