klimek added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D37813#1253813, @Typz wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D37813#1184051, @klimek wrote: > > > The problem here is that we have different opinions on how the formatting > > on namespace macros should behave in the first place- I think they should > > behave like namespaces, you want them to be formatted differently. > > Given that you want full control over the formatting of those macros, and > > them not actually be formatted exactly like namespaces or classes, I think > > we need a more generic mechanism for you to express that. > > > Not sure what you mean here. I want them to behave like namespaces as well, > this is actually the use case I have... As implemented, they indeed behave > exactly like namespaces : > > TESTSUITE(a) { namespace a { > } // TESTSUITE(a) } // namespace a > VS > TESTSUITE(a) { TESTSUITE(b) { namespace a { namespace b { > } // TESTSUITE(a::b) }} // namespace a::b I thought we had the discussion upthread that they indent differently from namespaces. I'm working on a patch that allows you to configure macros. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D37813 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
