aaron.ballman added a comment. Given the scope of what this changes (such as 3rd party configurations), I think that this requires a broader community discussion than what you'll get from this patch. I would suggest starting an [RFC] thread on cfe-commits and cfe-dev to see what people think of the idea.
Personally, I'm opposed to the idea. There is limited benefit compared to the number of scripts I will have to go update for out-of-tree builds where I'll suddenly be getting cmake warnings about a directory name that I've used without issue for years. If anything, I think the logic should be reversed so that we warn users who try to use "clang-tools-extra" as the directory name rather than "extra". Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D52819 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
