ldionne added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52660#1249709, @kristina wrote:
> LGTM. Can we formalize ABIv2 as stable and make it distinct from unstable > (soon to be ABIv3) or are there are any rough corners still left before ABIv2 > and unstable can split in a feature freeze? I'm not an expert on libc++ > related matters but @ldionne suggested that ABIv2 still wasn't ready on IRC > (unless I misunderstood him). I don't think we've ever had plans to freeze the ABI v2 into something stable -- this is the first time I hear about it. I'm not saying it does not make sense, by the way, just that I haven't heard any plans about this. Does Fuchsia have a desire to stabilize the ABI of libc++? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D52660 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
