kristina added a comment. I think on Darwin it would **not** make sense to have `libc++fs.a` ship in `libc++.dylib` especially considering that it ends up in the dyld cache and that has a lot of other implications. It would make sense to ship it as a separate library, perhaps as part of the SDK, at least for now. As far as making it a system dylib, it's a possibility as long as no core os components depend on it and it's there solely for consumers.
Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D45639 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
