sammccall accepted this revision.
sammccall added a comment.
Something not listed in cons: because macros aren't namespaced and we don't
have lots of signals, they can be really spammy.
Potentially, offering macros that aren't in the TU could be a loss even if it's
a win for other types of signals.
We could always e.g. postfilter index macro results using the include structure
of the preamble, so no concern for this patch, just something to think about
for the followup.
We also need to make sure that we're not indexing/serving header guards as code
completions (e.g. if SemaCodeComplete is currently taking care of this)
================
Comment at: clangd/index/FileIndex.cpp:48
CollectorOpts.RefFilter = RefKind::All;
+ }else {
+ IndexOpts.IndexMacrosInPreprocessor = true;
----------------
nit: please clang-format
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52078
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
