mstorsjo added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51440#1217839, @manojgupta wrote:
> Just a minor comment regarding test cases: Since you are adding both -L/path/ > and -l<libname>, the test cases should be updated to check for the -L/path/ > argument as well. I guess I could do that, although we don't know the path in the test, so we can only check for `-L.*`. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51440#1217868, @lebedev.ri wrote: > Since the libraries will no longer be specified with their full path, how > will you know that the **right** library will be picked, the one compiler > intended? We don't; the same goes for libgcc. I guess the risk for unintentional clashes is rather low; if the linker found another lib with the same name, I would expect it to be intentional, and using it wouldn't be wrong. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D51440 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
