kbobyrev added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-rename.rst:28 +:program:`clang-rename` infrastructure to handle renaming requests. Because of +much better editor integration and support, it is advised to use +:program:`clangd-rename` as part of :program:`clangd`. However, it is possible ---------------- ilya-biryukov wrote: > I would not recommend `clangd` at this point, it only supports single-file > renames, while `clang-rename` can actually do cross-TU renames IIUC. > Not opposed to putting recommendations of using `clangd`, of course, but > let's be explicit about the limitations. Interesting, I thought we do the same logic in Clangd. Yeah, I think we should fix that behavior. https://reviews.llvm.org/D51292 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
