ioeric added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51297#1214297, @ilya-biryukov wrote:
> Do we want to keep the docs for different editors separate or do we want to
> put them all into a single page in case we add more editors?
> I would vouch for keeping them on a single page, but that's not a strong
> opinion. Wonder what other people think?
Looking at the length of the vim integration doc, I think it might make sense
to keep the full vim integration doc separate. However, it might still make
sense to have short/simplified quick start instructions plus a link to the full
doc for more details in the main doc.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/index.rst:29
clangd
+ clangd-vim
clang-doc
----------------
`clangd-vim` is not a top-level project. I think this should be linked from
clangd documentation.
================
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormat.rst:97
+Clangd Integration
+==================
----------------
We could recomend formatting with clangd in clangd doc, but advertising here
seems a bit odd. I'd suggest dropping this.
And to be fair, clang-format editor plugins seem to be provide finer controls
than LSP clients.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51297
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
