Dmitry.Kozhevnikov marked an inline comment as done. Dmitry.Kozhevnikov added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50455#1193468, @ilya-biryukov wrote: > Nevertheless, I think this is moving clangd in the right direction and if we > see too many irrelevant errors, we should look into improving clang to show > less of those. A more conservative fix (demoting "include file not found" from fatal errors) was proposed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D50462, I'll try exploring that instead. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D50455 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
