erik.pilkington added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51189#1211754, @arphaman wrote:
> Hmm, I don't think this solution is ideal, we'd rather have an attribute > somewhere for other consumers of availability annotations. Does MyObject have > an implicit decl of `new`, or are we referring to `NSObject`s `new`? Ideally > we would an attribute on a particular `new` instead, but that might not work. We're referring to NSObject's new. I don't think it's unreasonable to ask users who override init to be unavailable also override new with the same annotation, but it seems like extra boilerplate for something that we can easily infer in clang. What other consumers are you concerned about? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D51189 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
