gregrodgers added a comment. I have a longer comment on header files, but let me first understand this patch.
IIUC,the concept of this patch is to fake the macros to think it is seeing a host on the device patch. if ((LangOpts.CUDA || LangOpts.OpenMPIsDevice) && PP.getAuxTargetInfo()) InitializePredefinedAuxMacros(*PP.getAuxTargetInfo(), Builder); That would be counterproductive because well-behaved headers that only provide optized asm definitions would wrap that asm with #ifdef __x86_64__ do some x86 asm function definition #else just provide the function declaration to be implemented somewhere else. #endif What am I missing? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D50845 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
