JonasToth added a comment. I am suprised that this does not automatically follow from the general rules. At the end, smartpointers cant do anything else then 'normal' classes.
The `operator+/->` were not handled before? The mutation of `SmartPtr x; x->mf();` should already be catched, not? Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D50883 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
