Meinersbur added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50805#1201956, @Quuxplusone wrote:
> If you added a new option `-Wret-addr-label` as suggested above (for a total > patch of +2 lines), then is it accurate to say: > > - if `-Wret-addr-label` was enabled by default, we know of at least one > codebase that would pass `-Wno-ret-addr-label` to their build > - if `-Wret-addr-label` was disabled by default, we don't know of any > codebases that would voluntarily enable it And if nobody would enable it > voluntarily... might as well eliminate it, right? That nobody here can name a project that would enable it, does not mean that there is none, or that projects will decide in the future to use it, or that individual developers temporarily use. Besides, it'd be enabled by `-Weverything`. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D50805 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
