JonasToth added a comment.
Please add a test for the same usecase as in Sema.
template <typename T>
struct SizeIndicator {
constexpr int value = 8;
};
template <>
struct SizeIndicator<int> {
constexpr int value = 4;
};
template <typename Foo>
void fooFunction() {
char Characters[SizeIndicator<Foo>::value];
void ArrayToPointerDecay(Characters);
}
template <>
void fooFunction<int>() {
char Character[SizeIndicator<int>::value];
void ArrayToPointerDecay(Characters);
}
In both cases the mutation must be detected. I assume the function
specialization is diagnosed correctly, because everything is resolved.
================
Comment at: unittests/clang-tidy/ExprMutationAnalyzerTest.cpp:454
+
+ AST =
+ tooling::buildASTFromCode("template <class T> void f() { T x; x.y.z; }");
----------------
Is there already a test for a method from a templated type?
E.g.
```
template <typename T>
struct Foo {
T x;
Foo() { int local_int; x(local_int); }
};
```
One can not say that `local_int` could be const or not.
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50619
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
