erik.pilkington added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50527#1194660, @rjmccall wrote:
> Assuming you've done enough source-compatibility testing to say with > reasonable confidence that this won't break anything, I think this is fine. > It's a core goal of Objective-C/C++ to allow the base language as a complete > subset if at all possible. I don't really see how this could break source-compatibility, I don't believe there is a way to start a binary operator's RHS with a colon[1] or a r_square, so this change can only affect programs that were previously ill-formed. I'll run some internal builds and report back though, just to be paranoid. [1] excluding the GNU conditional expr, which is handled because getIdentifierInfo will always return nullptr for '?'. https://reviews.llvm.org/D50527 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
