ldionne added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50205#1188454, @EricWF wrote:
> How does this work when a user provides their own definitions? Does the > attribute from the declaration still produce a warning? If so, then I think > an in-compiler approach is better. Yes. I do agree that not warning when the user provides their own definition is a better user experience, however I think that is already the behavior we have for sized new/delete (with `_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_SIZED_NEW_DELETE`). Is it any different? If we were to go for an in-compiler approach, what would be the behavior we want? Any TU that uses the operator but defines it would not get a warning, but any TU that uses it without defining it would still get a warning, right? If so, it doesn't seem like such a huge improvement. Repository: rCXX libc++ https://reviews.llvm.org/D50205 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
