ilya-biryukov added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49794#1182078, @yvvan wrote:

> I already mentioned in the review inherited by this one that this way covers 
> also loaded plugins with different consumers. So let's assume that driver 
> loads clang-tidy and some other plugins and runs over each file in the 
> project.
>  It makes sense not to include clang-tidy diagnostics coming from headers, at 
> least for third-party headers (you can still run clang over specific headers 
> themselves to get diagnostics for them).


For third-party headers, sure (as I mentioned before, we already use -isystem 
include directive for third party libs to achieve the same thing). But ignoring 
diagnostics from **all** the headers does not seem particularly useful.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D49794



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to