jvesely abandoned this revision. jvesely added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49650#1177323, @jvesely wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49650#1176336, @arsenm wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49650#1175461, @jvesely wrote: > > > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49650#1175438, @arsenm wrote: > > > > > > > According to cayman manual, these registers do exist so we should > > > > probably just make the feature accepted on r600 as well > > > > > > > > > sure, that's the way it was before r335942. I assumed the removal was > > > intentional. > > > > > > Probably accidental because nothing in r600 was actually using it > > > given the number of warnings it outputs, I find that unlikely. > @tstellar what was your intention? It's not like someone is going to work on > EG/CM denormals any time soon. > > I don't mind either way. I just want to avoid another round of bikeshedding. https://reviews.llvm.org/D49934 Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D49650 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
