rsmith added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/clang/AST/Expr.h:2928
+ bool getIsPartOfExplicitCast() const {
+ return CastExprBits.PartOfExplicitCast;
----------------
Please also rename this to`isPartOfExplicitCast` as requested on IRC.
================
Comment at: include/clang/AST/Stmt.h:206
unsigned Kind : 6;
- unsigned PartOfExplicitCast : 1;
+ unsigned PartOfExplicitCast : 1; // Only representable for
ImplicitCastExpr.
unsigned BasePathSize : 32 - 6 - 1 - NumExprBits;
----------------
representable for -> set for
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaCast.cpp:97
while ((CE = dyn_cast<ImplicitCastExpr>(CE->getSubExpr())))
- CE->setIsPartOfExplicitCast(true);
+ dyn_cast<ImplicitCastExpr>(CE)->setIsPartOfExplicitCast(true);
}
----------------
lebedev.ri wrote:
> lebedev.ri wrote:
> > erichkeane wrote:
> > > I think I'd prefer just using a different variable in the 'while' loop to
> > > avoid the cast. something like while((auto ICE =....
> > >
> > > That said, either way this isn't a dyn_cast, this would be just a cast
> > > (since we KNOW the type).
> > I was trying to avoid having one extra variable, which may confuse things.
> > Let's see maybe it's not that ugly..
> Indeed, `cast<>` should be used.
> But trying to avoid this cast at all results in uglier code, so let's not.
> (I need to call `getSubExpr()` on this new `ImplicitCastExpr`, so i'd need to
> maintain two variables, etc...)
Maybe something like:
```
for (auto *Next = CE->getSubExpr(); auto *ICE =
dyn_cast<ImplicitCastExpr>(Next); Next = ICE->getSubExpr())
ICE->setIsPartOfExplicitCast(true);
```
or just
```
for (; auto *ICE = dyn_cast<ImplicitCastExpr>(CE->getSubExpr()); CE = ICE)
ICE->setIsPartOfExplicitCast(true);
```
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49838
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
