dcoughlin added a subscriber: dcoughlin. dcoughlin added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D13126#302328, @danielmarjamaki wrote:
> When scanning 692 projects with this checker I got 56 warnings. I've triaged > 21 random warnings of these so far and saw 20 TP and 1 FP. > > When I have triaged the results there is one kind of "possible FP" that I > see, like this: > > unsigned long x = largevalue; > bytes[0] = x; // Possible FP here. Technically it's a TP but it's an loss > of precision by design. > bytes[1] = x >> 8; > .... > > > I am currently considering to allow this FP. Any opinions about allowing it? Is there mechanism by which the user can suppress false positives like this (for example, an explicit cast)? http://reviews.llvm.org/D13126 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
