rjmccall added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D14737#291481, @stephanemoore wrote:
> I hope that it's not presumptuous of me to inquire but I was wondering if the > intent of this patch is to optimize calls to RR methods (and alloc) in > non-ARC code? Would I be correct in assuming that clang will already emit > direct calls to relevant RR runtime functions when ARC is enabled? Correct. The patch turns ObjC message sends of -retain, -release, and +alloc into calls to the runtime functions we already use in ARC. This is largely irrelevant in ARC because it's illegal to write an ObjC message send of -retain or -release. The change to +alloc would still apply, however. http://reviews.llvm.org/D14737 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
